The science-annex of the newspaper, popular science magazines and books have always been things I enjoyed reading. I love to see how journalists are able to explain difficult science in a simple way, and would like to be able to do this as well and become a journalist one day. But I know that there are only very few people who can make science writing into a paid job, and I personally didn’t think I’m a good writer - so I always just left the writing to others…
For a recent project with my Department I had to come up with a few stories about our research in a simple way, and some colleagues complimented me on my writing. During this project, we browsed through popular media for scientific (mainly genetic) bullsh*t. This inspired me to write a story about misinterpretations of genetic research, and had my article published in our departmental newsletter. Searching for a more serious place to publish it, I came across a science-blog, Science Palooza (sorry, in Dutch), where sometimes guest-authors would send in articles. I plucked up some courage, emailed my story to the editors of the blog and they actually liked it! After some small changes my article got published - my debut as a science journalist was a fact! Maybe I had some hidden talents for writing after all?
A bit later I got new inspiration, wrote another article and it got published again, which promoted me to be an official co-author of the blog. From now on I can write and post more stories… Of course, I don’t get any money for this, but writing for a real audience (both scientists and non-scientist) is very good practice for getting experience!
Hi Eva, Have you already contacted someone from Bionieuws?? I think that would be a great start for your writing career, maybe you can do some kind of internship if your work allows you too...something to think about. Good luck!!!
Thanks Piet for you comment (also the ones on my blog). It is indeed a problem that is partly caused by the media. By using headlines that do not cover the contents of science, a wrong impression is made to the general public. It is our duty as scientists to do something about that, so feel free to write about it!
Nice articles. Maybe do one on the overly high expectations of science? I for one am getting frustrated by the results-on-demand question whenever the benefit of science to the general society is brought up. It leads to scientists making promises they cannot fulfill, which then results in the general public getting frustrated about scientists.
Comments
It is our duty as scientists to do something about that, so feel free to write about it!