Home Community Sabina Lukovac Impact Factor: a must read for every scientist!

Impact Factor: a must read for every scientist!
Tuesday, 06 April 2010 15:52

posted by Sabina Lukovac

'Science can be pretty boring, most of the time nothing really happens...you work like an idiot, waiting till you get your results and hoping they will be pioneering, revolutionary and worthwhile waiting...'. I bet this thought crossed your mind once or twice. However, sometimes science is everything but boring!! I just read the Dutch novel written by Paul Brand called 'Impact Factor'. It's an exciting thriller describing the fraud and crime within the field of scientific research in medical sciences...I was amazed!!

Although it's fiction, some of the things described in this book made me think about the integrity and the quality of the scientific research. How often does it occur that people are not quite honest about their data? How often do scientists try to make their data look better than it actually does? And how often do we find out afterwards that this really occured? Every now and then few extreme cases hit the news (like the Korean 'cloning-master') or the Vranken-case in the Netherlands...but what about the rest?

Apparently almost 10 percent of the scientists is not completely honest about their data...what can we do to improve the quality of the scientific research? How can we reduce the number of fraud papers? Probably, in the future most of the journals will require our raw data along with the submission of our article...

 

Comments 

 
#3 s lukovac 2010-05-24 15:00
Hi Sanne, I am not sure if there is an English version out already...
Quote
 
 
#2 sanne* 2010-05-21 16:50
Is this book also available in English? Would be a nice gift for some of my colleagues here.
Quote
 
 
#1 Chiat Cheong 2010-04-06 16:50
This sounds like book with a lot of suspense. Of course it is fiction but too bad if it gives negative publicity to science.

Good science is evidence-based isn't it? The truth as good as we can describe it. Hopefully people are aware of the existence of peer-review. What makes the difference between science and pseudo-science. 10% is a lot, was that scientifically proven : ) ? Do you know what part was falsification on purpose? Or does it include incorrect analysis (but then... the reviewers should have rejected it).

How to improve the quality of scientific research? Last week I came across this: 'Peer review - guide for researchers', http://www.rin.ac.uk/node/519

It is worth reading, it explains what peer review is and also discusses how it should be used. More stringent controls may improve the quality, but as a researcher you would probably agree that it should not become so difficult that it is near-impossible to get anything published!
Quote
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh